Conwy and Llandudno Local <email@example.com>
10:33 AM (23 hours ago)
Hello Inspector Naughton
Yes I wish to discuss things pertaining to the horrendous crime my wife and I have been accused of, the same crime our home was raided for, a raid that was not carried out according to pace.
Why else would I wish to talk with you? certainly not about the continued internet harassment we are having to contend with, why would I bring that to your attention? I mean to say you did nothing near to the perpetrators of CSI Llandudno, that you have to my wife and I, this I find extremely disturbing, and please do not insult me by repeating what Bricknell said to us, when he concluded his investigation into the same.
“We need Google to assist us in tracing the IP addresses for those responsible and Google will not help”, this is bull as you know. You needed to raid the premises of Nigel Roberts seize his equipment, you know, like you have done mine and my family’s.
Please do not insult me further by saying you had no proof it was him, we provided clear evidence of his guilt.
I have asked relevant questions of PC Barlow, to which I cannot get answers, you are his superior so it would be safe to assume you could provide those answers, it is clear to me you do not wish to meet with me so I will ask the same questions via this email.
Do you think the way my wife and I have been treated was proportional?
Who authorised our arrests and the subsequent raid on our home?
At the very least why was my wife not asked to attend Llandudno Police station to be interviewed, this is a lady who has never put a foot wrong in her life, after all that is all you did with Roberts over the CSI blog.
Why did your officers not adhere to PACE? especially when it came to taking our children s belongings, if you care to check PACE you will see they had to provide a satisfactory explanation when seizing items belonging to children, they did not.
Why a week after our arrests were my wife’s and my mobile phone returned and not those belonging to our children, or the defunct ones, we were told during interview they would be prioritised, I find this somewhat suspicious.